Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Movie Review: Ted Talks; Bugs, Beasts & Biowilderment 2011

Crystal Day
Summer 2013


Before I saw Sci-fi movies, I did not really have any particular passions or interests. I was all over the place, a teenager. My interest was peaked via films and I was hooked.


Sci-Fi films influenced me in a big way as far as my interests and career choices. I chose to work in the healthcare field because of my interest in the sciences. I always loved the films that mixed some science with imagination and vision focused on the future. So I had to pick one I am going to talk about the most recent show I saw that was part of the series, Ted Talks found at Tedtalks.com.


Rachel Sussman was the author of this particular episode. It was more like going to a work seminar only more fun. She stood on a stage and talked to the audience. The authors were told that they would be given 15 minutes to talk about anything they thought relevant.  I watched her DVD-type seminar, which in the Ted Talks series called: “Beasts, Bugs, and Bio-wilderment”, on Netflix. Pretty fascinating on oldest living things in the world which she defined as being over 2000 years old.


The series talks about survival and the environment. She traveled to different parts of the world.  She said that she started out just wanting to take some pictures but after seeing the different things and different places, it turned into much more. Her interest was peaked and her theory was that if we studied why these certain things were still alive and thriving after 2000 years, it would tell us something about the environment and survival. It sort of makes sense that some people say, we can tell the future by our past patterns.


It excites me to know that things like that are still being discovered or re-discovered today and people like her are still out there with their childhood wonder and imaginations and visions about the future, doing things that sometimes accidentally helps us all out medically or scientifically. I have a couple of friends who are also devoting their lives to science and saving the environment so, I can relate to their cause and passion.


There is a guy named Larry Brilliant, who “Wants to stop pandemics.” He lived in a specific place that was very remote and studied the environment there. Since he was a scientist, it sort of evolved as far as how he came to study different bacterias and survival rates and new species not previously discovered. Another person devoting their life to a cause that perhaps could help the world.


After looking them both up in Wikipedia, and searching their websites, their resumes appear very credible as well as their topics, research and photographs/records. Rachel Sussman’s strength is Art and Larry Brilliant’s strength is that he is a doctor.


The thing I know from experience about science is that it involves art which helps with being able to measure and document. That is a big part of science. My first microbiology class was probably my very first attempt at drawing something other than a straight line. I quickly had to adapt to documenting bacteria and pond scum which sounds dull but not


if you are actually doing it. These things we overlook on our walks every day, tree fungus and the like, are really very beautiful when looked at under a microscope. It took my breath away the first time I saw pond scum. And I still think about the things I learned in class, like how everything is made up of molecules and there is space in between them, we just can’t see it.


REQUESTED INFORMATION LIST:
TITLE: Ted Talks: Bugs, Beasts & Biowilderment: Rachel Sussman 2011
GENRE: Sci-Fi/documentary/art
DIRECTOR’S NAME: Kelly Stoetzel, Content Director
WRITERS NAMES: There is only one writer of the 15 minutes, my understanding is that Rachel Sussman herself wrote her speach. There are however a team of editors for Ted Talks and it’s about 4 pages long. I will attache the info.
CINEMATOGRAPHER’S NAME: Not sure if that would be the same as the Creative Services Director or Digital Traffic Manager. Or the HP Color Project people who are listed as Ted Talks Partners.
EDITORS NAMES: As stated above. I have attached the editor’s names as there is a team and it’s about 4 pages long.
WHO ARE THE PRINCIPLE CHARACTERS: There is only one character, Rachel Sussman and her photographs and her speech.
WHAT IS THEIR SITUATION: She is talking about her life’s work and her interests that became a sort of science project, about the environment.
~~~
Larry Brilliant, (2011). Found on Netflix: Ted Talks: Defying Disease. Wants to stop pandemics.


Sussman, Rachel. (2011). The World’s Oldest Living Things. Found on Netflix. Her website is: www.RachelSussman.com. Ted Talks: Bugs, Beasts & Biowilderment-Netflix. And, www.oLtw.blogspot.com


www.Wikipedia.com searched on 06 11 13 at 4p.m.


Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Movie Review: The IT Crowd: S2 E6 2006


by Crystal Day
Summer 2013
June 17
Page 1 of 2


TITLE
The IT Crowd: Series 2: Episode 6: Men Without Women
GENRE
Comedy
DIRECTOR
Itle de Groot, Assist. Dir. Corita de Wilt
WRITER
Graham Lineham
CINEMATO-
GRAPHER
Francis De Groote and Bill Broomfield
EDITOR
Richard Halladay. There are 7 total editors
PRINCIPLE CHARACTERS
Roy - the slacker, Moss - social misfit,
Jen - technically ingorant supervisor
SITUATION
/SETTING
Jen gets called up to her boss’ office. Lots of brown wood, looks typical for a high-rise office, big white leather chair of comfort for the boss.
PROTAGONIST
Jen
ANTAGONIST
Jen’s boss


About 17:07 minutes into this episode, [exposition] Jen gets called into her boss’ office. He stands there posing, looking out a window. Acts like he does not see her at first, [she is standing in the doorway, then walks into office-(bulk)].  Then he walks to his chair, sits down and tells her to leave. She turns to leave and as she does so, has a disapproving look on her face. He proceeds to send her mixed messages, tells her he likes her because she has backbone, spunk and balls (which is ironic because she is doing the exact opposite) saying that most others would have asked him lots of questions like, why did he ask them to come up, only to tell them to leave.


Crystal Day
Summer 2013
June 17
Page 2 of 2


The scene is from Jen’s perspective as she walks in the office, she speaks with a humble quiet voice to his demands. There is first contempt on her face, then joy as he finally tells her she is being promoted [Resolution]. After I watched that scene again, I noticed that he had her sit on a chair that looked like a hand and told her to “sit on his hand.” There were lots of obvious subliminal messages about sex from the boss which Jen tried to ignore. There was no sound except for some cued audience laughter.


ACTORS: Katherine Parkinson, Richard Ayoade, Chris O’Dowd.

References:  IMdb at http://www.imdb.com Search words: The IT crowd

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Movie Reviews and Original Narratives Explained

I will begin by posting Movie Reviews.
Then perhaps some Original Movie-Script Shorts.
If I tell you the Titles now, it would give away the surprise. . . April 2014

Movie Review: Casablanca 1943

[On 09/18/13 at 2p watched Casablanca
on Youtube.com which is a Google affiliate.
The cost was $1.99 to rent and see it once through.]
. . .Review by Crystal Day



Movie: Casablanca
Year: 1942, Release date 1943
Genre: Drama, Romance, War
RunTime: 1 h 42 min
Producer: Jack L. Warner, Uncredited Hal B. Wallis
Central Characters:  Humphrey Bogart (RICK),
Ingrid Bergman (ILSA), Paul Henreid (LASZLO)
Screenplay Writers: Julius J. & Philip G. Epstein,
& Howard Koch
Director: Michael Curtiz



TAGLINE:  An American expatriate meets a former lover with unforeseen complications. . .

The beginning credits went so fast I completely missed the symbolism.

(RunTime (RT) 3:41) The scene starts off with a shooting in broad daylight with other people watching.

Man loses wallet while setup is being described by passerby pickpocket.

CAMERA ANGLES focus on expression of people, waist up shots. LIGHTING is DAYTIME with few shadows. There are PAN SHOTS to show setting. Everyone looks up at the plane that passes by. This is a GROUP reaction SHOT/MASTER SHOT. The film is in black and white.

Through dialogue we learn that the underbelly of Europe has gathered here preying on others misfortune. As they look up at the plane, there is hope of freedom from the ravages of war. Ironically, this plane lands and out walk a few high-ranking Nazi soldiers.

The chief says, "Unoccupied France welcomes you." There are many direct dialogue lines to help audience understand the intricacies of this war.

The name of the club is EXPLICIT in describing RICK's character, even though his dialogue at times says otherwise.

The SONG "Who’s Got Troubles?" is another FORESHADOWING of the scrappy situation of time and place. This IMPLICIT FORESHADOWING recurs often throughout the movie.

The tricky relationship between RICK and the French High Official takes place behind closed doors, another PLOT POINT in a sequence of PLOT POINTS that leads to the final RESOLUTION.

The Textbook p121 called “Looking At Movies” says that the main plot is: "straightforward, holding together the story, which concerns the interaction of politics, personal ethics, and love…" The author says the inciting moment is when the visas are handed off which is IMPLICIT and from there it's all about the goal, acquiring the exit visas and getting to safety for LASZLO AND ILSA. The subplot being that RICK still loves ILSA and that's why the RESOLUTION.

It's amazing how many times I have seen this but never caught the dialogue where ILSA tells RICK that she was married to LASZLO even in Paris when they fell in love. That explains the subplot.

I have seen this movie at least 10 times in my life.  What caught my attention on first viewing was the fear in the people's faces around the politics of the Nazis. The political intricacies I found very interesting and terrifying at the same time.

Many Thanks to my Writing College Professor, Peter Maxwell, who taught me the many ways to look at and examine this movie for all of it's ELEMENTS.

References:

Barsam, Richard & Monahan, Dave "Looking At Movies: An Introduction to Film" 3rd Ed. (2013) New York: Norton.
wwnorton.com

IMdb.com Search words: Casablanca

Trottier, David "The Screenwriter's Bible" 5th Ed. (2010) California: Silman-James Press
keepwriting.com/tsc/swbible.htm


Intro

I am a writer. 

As a young adult, my philosophy was to live life to the fullest running from one adventure to the next. Only, not in a good way. It was more like slamming my head onto the brick wall of life and people. To say I was unprepared is an understatement. The only useful thing growing up was basic self-defense training and what I call, desert rat survival skills. My best effort to problem-solving was to drop-panic-and-run.

Needless to say, all of the above became great material for narratives, albeit some of them unbelievable.

I love interesting people, those who love adventure or lean towards creative expression. I am not afraid to talk politics on occasion and I am a Human Rights advocate. 

Why do I write you ask? I write myself out of my nightmares and into my dreams. I write to quell the pain. I write as one who walks on the surface of a frozen river beginning to melt. I write as a witness to what I have seen. (Ref: Terry Tempest Williams). I write to entertain. I write to leave my mark on the world. 

Some of my other obsessions are: movies, nature photography, motorcycles, science, and watching a good stand-up comic.

Welcome to the Blog. 


(Comments are moderated to keep this a safe place for everyone who visits)